| New telecommunication media | Syllabus |
| Comm 4291 | Spring 2008 |
| Prof. Gil Rodman | GTA Julie Wilson |
| rodman@umn.edu / 626.7721 | wils0775@umn.edu / 626.0574 |
| office hours (253 Ford): TuTh 2:30-4:00p, W 2:00-3:00p, and by appointment | office hours (275 Ford): Tu 12:30-2:00p, Th 2:00-3:30p |
It has become something of a cliché to claim that the world has been "revolutionized" by the broad and eclectic range of "new" communication technologies that includes the Internet, laptop computers, mobile phones, iPods, Blackberries, and the like. How true that cliché is, however, depends a great deal on precisely which technologies one is talking about and on just where in the world one is trying to measure their impact. This course will provide a survey of some -- but by no means all -- of the major social, cultural, and political issues raised by the growth and spread of digital media. While our readings will occasionally include brief technical discussions, this is not a course about the science of digital media (e.g., how does WiFi work? what are the acoustic limitations of satellite radio? etc.) and your ability to succeed will not depend on whether you can master the intricacies of software engineering, computer circuitry, or the like.
Few (if any) of the questions we'll address this semester have easy or predictable answers. How well you do in this class will depend on (1) your ability to think critically about issues related to technology, media, culture, and politics, and (2) your ability to argue your position(s) on those issues persuasively, rather than your ability to memorize and repeat the "right" answers.
All rules listed in the original syllabus are in effect when the semester begins and remain in effect until and unless they are officially changed.
There are three types of course rules:
In the event of conflicts between two or more rules, major rules take precedent over minor rules, and permanent rules take precedent over both major and minor rules. If conflicting rules are in the same level of the hierarchy, the rule with the lowest number takes precedent (e.g., a rule numbered #3-152 would take precedence over a rule numbered #3-155).
There are three categories of class participants:
All students have the right to propose new rules and/or rule changes, and to vote on official ballots. In any voting situation, each student has exactly one vote. In the event of a tie vote, the GTA is empowered to cast the deciding vote. Should the GTA choose not to resolve the deadlock, the professor will cast the deciding vote. Otherwise, the professor and the GTA are non-voting participants.
Any ballot that fails to achieve a quorum of at least 50% of all eligible voters will be null and void, regardless of the final outcome of the vote.
When a ballot passes in accordance with the course rules, the student who formally proposed that ballot will have one (1) point added to their final course grade.
For purposes of all course rules, a "course week" begins at 11:15:00 am CT every Tuesday and lasts until 11:14:59 pm CT on the following Tuesday.
Questions about specific grades should be directed to the assignment's original grader. In the event of a dispute over a GTA-assigned grade, the student in question must make every reasonable effort to resolve that dispute with the GTA before the professor will intervene. Should the professor intervene in such a dispute, he will re-grade the assignment in question, and the resulting grade -- which may be higher than, the same as, or lower than the original grade -- will become the official grade of record for the assignment. The GTA is not empowered to change grades assigned by the professor.
No course rules can be created, changed, or amended in such a way as to violate (a) federal, state, or local law; (b) official UMN regulations; and/or (c) Communication Studies policies.
The following required books are available at the University Bookstore in Coffman Union:
Please note that earlier editions exist for both the Lessig and Raymond books. Students who opt to acquire their books from alternate sources should make sure that they acquire the editions listed above.
Students who choose the major research project option (see #2-010 below) are strongly encouraged to use the following recommended book (which is also available at the University Bookstore in Coffman Union) as a helpful guide for how to conceive, plan, research, and write their final papers:
All students on the official course roster as of 21 Jan have been given posting privileges for the course blog.
The principal uses for the blog will be for:
Further details on how to access the blog are available on a separate handout.
All students are required to purchase a molded rubber yoga mat (in UMN maroon and/or gold only; minimum length of 120 inches) that they will bring to every class meeting from 5 Feb until the end of the semester. Students who come to class without their yoga mats will have their course grade docked one (1) point for each and every such infraction.
Final course grades will be calculated using the following schedule:
| Thought paper | 10% |
| Reading responses | 30% |
| Major research project OR Take-home final exam | 60% |
Final grade point totals will translate to letter grades as follows:
| A 93-100 | B 83-86 | C 73-76 | D 63-66 |
| A- 90-92 | B- 80-82 | C- 70-72 | D- 60-62 |
| B+ 87-89 | C+ 77-79 | D+ 67-69 | F 0-59 |
Class meetings will be structured around discussions rather than lectures. The professor will assume that all students present on any given day are suitably prepared to contribute to those discussions: i.e., they will have done the assigned reading carefully enough to offer productive comments and questions about the reading. In this context, "being prepared" does not require a full mastery of the assigned readings. It does, however, require the sort of good faith effort that can be demonstrated with a thoughtful question and/or a clear explanation of at least some meaningful portion of the reading. Vague, superficial, and/or generic contributions (e.g., "I just didn't get it," "I liked this essay," "What does [word found in the reading] mean?") will not count as evidence of adequate preparation.
The professor will routinely call on students by name and ask them to contribute to the discussion. Students who are absent or unprepared when called upon in, or who otherwise demonstrate that they are not suitably prepared, will have their course grades docked according to the following schedule:
| absent | unprepared | |
|---|---|---|
| 1st time | 0 points | 0 points |
| 2nd-3rd time | 1 point each | 2 points each |
| 4th+ time | 2 points each | 3 points each |
In appreciation of Tim Behme's excellent work as the department's undergraduate advisor, all students must bring one of the following items to class for Tim on 14 Feb:
Students who fail to meet this requirement will have their course grade docked by three (3) points.
(a) Where/how to submit assignments. Unless specifically noted otherwise in the course rules, all written work must be submitted in both printed and digital versions, and the text of each version must be identical.
(b) Deadlines. At least one -- and preferably both -- versions of any assignment must be submitted by 11:15 am on the date it is due. Students who only submit one of the two required versions on time have until 3:30 pm on the due date to submit the other version. Late penalties will apply to all assignments where (a) neither printed or digital versions have been submitted by 11:15 am or (b) only one version has been submitted by 3:30 pm. Late penalties will be assessed in direct proportion to the assignment's lateness. The minimum penalty in all such cases will be one full letter grade.
(c) Grammar/spelling/etc. Grades for written assignments will be based primarily on content (rather than form): e.g., insightful, smartly argued essays that contain a few spelling errors will almost always receive higher grades than grammatically flawless papers that have weak arguments. Nonetheless, grammar, spelling, and style still matter to the effective presentation of a strong argument, and assignments suffering from significant "form" problems will be penalized accordingly.
(d) Accepted languages. All written assignments submitted after 31 Jan must be submitted in one (or more) of the following languages:
| Bottle-nosed Dolphin | Klingon | Navajo |
| Esperanto | Mandarin Chinese | Proto-Indo-European |
| Flemish | Mayan | Wolof |
All students must write and submit a short (1000-1250 words) paper by 29 Jan. This assignment will be ungraded. Students who turn the paper in on time should receive full credit for doing so, though the professor reserves the right to give partial (or even no) credit to papers that fall short of the assignment's requirements. Further details about this assignment are available on a separate handout. That handout constitutes a legally binding extension of this course rule.
All students must write and submit a minimum of fifteen (15) short reading responses, each of which will consist of a significant comment or question about a different one of our assigned readings. Each reading response is due by 11:15 am the day before the class period for which a given reading is assigned. Further details about this assignment are available on a separate handout. That handout constitutes a legally binding extension of this course rule.
This assignment will result in a 4000+ word argumentative research paper on a topic appropriate to the course's central theme. Final papers are due by 10:00 am on 14 May. There are several mandatory intermediate deadlines designed to help students complete their projects in a timely and satisfactory fashion.
This assignment is designed so that it can be used to satisfy the Senior Paper requirement for Communication Studies majors. Students intending to use this project for this purpose must:
Further details about this assignment are available on a separate handout. That handout constitutes a legally binding extension of this course rule.
All students will design and code a major piece of software from scratch. Allowable types of software for this assignment are limited to the following:
| e-mail client | ogg-vorbis music player | spreadsheet |
| instant messaging client | photo editor | web browser |
| MMORPG engine | RSS feedreader | word processor |
To help avoid potentially disastrous misunderstandings, the following is a partial list of major examples of academic dishonesty:
Further information about the University's official policies with respect to academic dishonesty -- including more detailed explanations of what constitutes "plagiarism" and "cheating" -- can be found online at http://writing.umn.edu/tww/plagiarism/
From 5 Feb onward, all of our class meetings will begin with a mandatory group recitation of "The Oath of Eternal Loyalty to Brett Favre." The full text of this oath (which all students must commit to memory) is as follows:
I swear by all that is holy and true in the cosmosStudents who fail to memorize the Oath completely and accurately, to participate in our in-class recitations of the Oath, and/or to abide by the noble ideals expressed in the Oath will have their final course grade penalized one (1) point for each infraction.
Students are allowed to make audio recordings of our class meetings for their personal use, provided they can do so without disrupting the ordinary flow of the class. The purchase and/or sale of either written notes or audio recordings of our class meetings is strictly prohibited.
Significant disruptions of the normal flow of course-related business -- e.g., using cell phones in class, excessive side chatter, engaging in premature leave-taking behavior -- will result in grade penalties for the student(s) involved.
The schedule below lists reading assignments and due dates for major written assignments. Readings should be completed in advance of the dates listed.
Jan 22With the sole exception of rule changes proposed in class on 24 Jan (see #3-013 below), all changes/additions/amendments to the course rules must adhere to the four-step process described in rules #3-003 through #3-006.
From 1 Feb onward, all course-related e-mail sent to either the professor or the GTA must have a timestamp indicating that it was sent between 3:24:00 am and 3:32:17 am CT. E-mail sent outside that obligatory time period will be ignored.
All potential rule changes must first be proposed on the course blog. An official proposal will consist of a post to the course blog in which:
Proposed rule changes must relate to official course business in a clear and explicit fashion, and must be enforceable within the existing structure of the course. The outcome of any and all ballots must be fully decidable by means of a simple Yes/No vote.
Students may formally propose a maximum of one (1) rule change each per course week. In the event that a student proposes more than one legally formatted ballot in a single course week, only the first such ballot proposed will be considered to be legitimate.
The successful posting of a properly formatted proposal will automatically start a 72-hour period for open discussion of the proposal in question. The discussion period is intended to give proposal authors the opportunity to assess the potential effects and/or viability of their proposals -- and, if they so desire, to make revisions to their proposals prior to any formal vote. During the discussion period, any and all course participants are welcome to use the course blog to offer questions, suggestions, objections, and/or other commentary on the proposal in question.
After the discussion period ends, the original proposal author has three options:
(a) To post an official revision to the proposal. Such a revision must follow the same format described in #3-003 above except that the word "PROPOSAL" must be replaced by the word "BALLOT." Once the discussion period has ended and a legally formatted revision has been posted, no further revisions are permitted, and the voting period (see below) begins immediately.
(b) To withdraw the proposal completely. For a withdrawal to be official, the original proposal author must post a new message to the course blog that clearly, unambiguously, and unconditionally states her/his desire to withdraw the proposal. Once formally withdrawn, a proposal is not eligible for an official vote unless it is subsequently put forward as a new proposal following the rules described here.
(c) To do nothing. If 24 hours passes after the discussion period and neither (a) nor (b) above has happened, then the original proposal automatically becomes a "live" ballot.
The official voting period for all ballots will last for 72 hours. All voting shall be done via e-mail. Votes must be sent to rodman@umn.edu during the official voting period for any given ballot item and must conform to the following rules:
From 1 Feb onwards, all students must wear T-shirts to class honoring two great Minnesota sports teams of the past. On Tuesdays, students must wear maroon T-shirts displaying a team photo of the 1962 Rose Bowl champion Gophers. On Thursdays, students must wear gold T-shirts displaying a reproduction of the Minnesota Daily story describing the women's basketball team's appearance in the 2004 Final Four. Students who fail to wear the appropriate T-shirts on the appropriate days will have their course grade docked two (2) points for each infraction.
Changes to existing rules are considered to have passed if and only if:
New rules are considered to have passed if and only if:
By 1 May, all students must have taken a candid photograph of themselves with a celebrity (preferably on a family vacation or a secret date), had their photo published on one of the leading celebrity news/gossip blogs (preferably perezhilton.com or tmz.com), and post a link to their celebrity photo on the course blog. In order to qualify, the celebrities in question cannot be current or past residents of the state of Minnesota. Students who fail to complete this assignment will have their course grade docked three (3) points.
Any rule change(s) resulting from a passed ballot shall take effect at the start of the first class meeting following the completion of the voting period. No ballot may have retroactive application, even if its wording explicitly states otherwise.
The full text of any rule changes resulting from passed ballots shall be added to the official course rules maintained on the course blog.
During our class meeting on 24 Jan, students will have the opportunity to meet in small groups for the purposes of proposing changes to the course rules. After that review process, each group will be allowed to propose one (1) official ballot item in class. Using the official form provided for this purpose, any such ballot items must be submitted to the professor by the end of class on 24 Jan. The discussion and revision periods for these ballot items will be waived, and the 72-hour voting period will begin immediately after the professor posts the ballot items to the course blog. For purposes of rule #1-007, grade points for any "first week" ballot item that is officially approved will be awarded to all listed members of the group that originally authored the ballot.
This rule does not infringe on the right of any individual student to propose a separate ballot item during the first course week in accordance with the procedures described above.
N.B.: There are no fewer than nine (9) deliberately flawed rules in the initial syllabus. Students are strongly encouraged to locate these, to propose rule changes that would repeal and/or modify them, and to vote these rule changes into effect. Otherwise, by rule #1-001, even these flawed rules will remain in effect until and unless they are officially changed.
Before classes resume after spring break, all students must have officially and permanently changed their major, and must provide suitable documentation demonstrating that this change has been filed with the University. Students who begin the semester as Communication Studies majors must change to one of the following majors: Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, Dental Hygiene, Radiation Therapy, or Urban and Community Forestry. All other students must change their major to Communication Studies. Students who fail to provide documentation of their major change will be assigned a course grade of "F."