| Media and New Orleans | Syllabus |
| Comm 3110-001 | Fall 2008 |
| Prof. Gil Rodman | |
| rodman@umn.edu / 626.7721 | |
| office hours (253 Ford): TuTh 10-11:15a, W 10-11:30a, and by appointment |
New Orleans is a city with a rich history. It's the birthplace of jazz and (arguably) the blues and rock 'n' roll as well. It's long been one of the busiest ports in the US. It's a city of incredible diversity: one that's often described as the most European of US Cities . . . and as the northernmost Caribbean city . . . and as one of the classic cities of the old South. It's home to the largest and most famous Mardi Gras festival in North America. And, of course, it was devastated by Hurricane Katrina in 2005: three years later, nearly half the pre-Katrina population of the city remains displaced.
We will spend a lot of time this semester talking about Katrina -- the impact of the storm on the city, the short-term news coverage of the event, the longer-term media attention (or lack thereof) to the post-storm recovery efforts -- but first we will set the stage for that story by studying New Orleans as a major site for both music and tourism. Focusing on music and tourism in the first part of the semester will not only help us understand a bit more about pre-Katrina New Orleans, but it will also help us better understand some of the ways that the people of New Orleans have responded to the aftermath of the storm.
Music and tourism may seem like unusual focal points for a course on media -- but only if one takes a very narrow view of what counts as media. Neither music nor tourism necessarily appear to be media-centered phenomena -- one can hear music performed live, after all, and being a tourist often involves detaching oneself from one's usual media habits -- but part of what this course will suggest is that both of these spheres of activity are, in fact, tightly interwoven into the contemporary US mediascape.
Perhaps most importantly, though, we will spend the semester thinking critically and complexly about the relationship between media and New Orleans. By necessity, this will force us to examine difficult questions of race and class, poverty and privilege, community and mobility, tradition and development, and then some. None of these questions come with easy or simple answers, and we will not necessarily end the semester with any of them settled once and for all. How well you do in this class will depend on your ability to think critically about the issues involved and your ability to argue your position(s) well, rather than your ability to memorize and repeat the "right" answers.
Our required book -- Kevin Fox Gotham, Authentic New Orleans -- is available at the University Bookstore in Coffman Union. The rest of our readings will be made available in PDF format.
The documentary, When the Levees Broke, is also available (in DVD format) at the University Bookstore in Coffman Union. Please note that while it is listed there as "recommended," it is required viewing.
Final course grades will be calculated using the following schedule:
| Reading/viewing responses | 30% |
| Critical response papers (3 @ 10% each) | 30% |
| Take-home final exam | 40% |
Accumulated grade point totals translate to final course grades as follows:
| A 93-100 | B 83-86 | C 73-76 | D 60-66 |
| A- 90-92 | B- 80-82 | C- 70-72 | F 0-59 |
| B+ 87-89 | C+ 77-79 | D+ 67-69 |
"I" grades will only be given under extraordinary circumstances (i.e., major life emergencies).
Our class meetings will be structured around seminar-style discussions rather than formal lectures. This means that you should always come to class (1) having done the assigned readings/viewings carefully and thoughtfully, and (2) prepared to contribute to our discussions about that material in productive ways. This class is not a spectator event, and I will expect everyone who shows up for class to be able and willing to participate meaningfully in our conversations. Please note that "being prepared" does not require you to have fully mastered the assigned reading/viewing: it simply requires you to have done the reading/viewing closely enough to contribute thoughtful questions and/or comments to our discussions.
You will write and submit a minimum of fifteen (15) short reading/viewing responses, each of which will consist of a significant comment or question about a different one of our assigned readings/viewings. Each response is due by 11:15 am the day before the class period for which a given reading/viewing is assigned.
You will write three critical response papers (750-1000 words each) over the course of the semester, each of which should be a critical (i.e., thoughtful and analytical) response to the assigned readings/viewings from a particular unit of the course. Due dates (with associated readings) are as follows:
| Paper #1 (4-30 Sep) | 7 Oct |
| Paper #2 (2-30 Oct) | 4 Nov |
| Paper #3 (4 Nov-4 Dec) | 9 Dec |
This exam (due by 10:30 am on 16 Dec) will consist entirely of three essay questions (1000-1250 words each) and will be based on the assigned readings/viewings and our in-class discussions. It will consist of one mandatory question and two questions that you will choose from a larger selection.
(a) Where/how to submit assignments. Critical response papers and the take-home final must be submitted in both printed and digital versions, and the text of each version must be identical. Reading/viewing responses must be submitted in digital form.
(b) Deadlines. Except for the take-home final (which is due at 10:30 am), all submission deadlines are 11:15 am on the relevant due date. The minimum penalty for late assignments will be one full letter grade. Critical response papers will be considered "on time" (a) if at least one of the two required versions is submitted on time and (b) if the other version is submitted no more than 24 hours after the official deadline. Reading/viewing responses will not be accepted after the deadline. Deadlines are not negotiable or subject to extensions, except in cases involving:
(c) Grammar/spelling/etc. Assignment grades will be based primarily on content and argument, rather than form and style: insightful, smartly argued essays that contain a few spelling errors will almost always receive higher grades than grammatically flawless papers that have weak arguments. Nonetheless, grammar, spelling, and style still matter to the effective presentation of a strong argument, and assignments suffering from significant "form" problems will be penalized accordingly.
The following is a partial list of major examples of academic dishonesty:
The minimum penalty for academic dishonesty is a zero for the assignment in question.
Further information about the University's official policies with respect to academic dishonesty can be found online at http://writing.umn.edu/tww/plagiarism/