Broom
(Literary & Arts magazine)
Sherwood Anderson (novelist), Amy
Lowell (poet), Conraid Aiken (novelist), Gertrude
Stein (poet), John Dos Passos (novelist), Man
Ray (photographer), Picasso (painter), Jospeh
Stella (painter), Fernand Leger (painter), Virginia
Woolf (novelist), Pirandello (dramatist), Dostoevsky
(novelist), Lipschitz (painter), Matisse(painter),Gris(painter),
Sheeler (painter), Marianne Moore(poet),
e. e. cummings (poet), Malcolm Cowley(literary
critic), Hart Crane (novelist),William Carlos
Williams (poet), Yvor Winters (literary critic)
The Science of Language at the
Time of
Permanence & Change
What is Logical Positivism?
Most vitally endorsed by a school of philosophers now identified as the Vienna Circle (Carnap, Neurath, and others), Logical Positivism marked a philosophy of language with two essential tenets:
Logical Positivism was for decades a kind of boogeyman in the philosophy of language. All that was wrong or inadequate in our understanding of language was pinned on these philosophers.
Recent scholarship has rehabilitated the Logical Positivists by noting that their work was tied to strong socilaist causes in Austria, and by noting that Logical Positivism was sen by its contemporaries as a kind of corrective for the more metaphysical German political discourse of the day, which "named " things ("the People," for example, ) whose existence the Logical Positivists would have found untenable. This kind of critique of Nazi discourse would be undertaken by Victor Klemperer during and after the war (see I Will Bear Witness).
The Dissemination of Logical Positivism
Variations of Logical Positivism were transmitted through (for example) Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (a work advancing a picture theory of language which Wittgenstein quickly admitted was insufficient, but nonetheless caught on quite quickly) and through the writings of Bertrand Russell.
The Critiques of Logical Positivism
There are five central critiques of Logical
positivism, of which Burke is only one. Burke was deeply aware of at
least three of these critiques.
| Triadic Semiotics | General Semantics | Speech-Act Theory | Anthropological Theories of Language | Kenneth Burke |
| As proposed by Charles Pierce and later developed by C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards in The Meaning of Meaning, a theory of triadic semiotics notes the influence of psychology on the interpretation of signs. No linguistic signs can refer to reality in a means unmediated by psychology. (Theories of psychology consulted included William James' philosophy of mind and C. S. Sherrington's neuropsychology.) | As proposed by Alfred Korzybski (Science and Sanity) and advanced by S. I. Hayakawa (Language in Thought and Action), the General Semantics movement was the keystone in especially postwar English education. The system emphasized the study of the levels of abstraction involved in language used, and argued that distorted communication often occurred at the higher levels of abstraction. | As proposed by J. L. Austin (How to Do Things With Words)
and advanced by John Searle and Jurgen Habermas, Speech Act Theory
emphasized the role of language in action (like creating a
marriage contract, or christening a boat, for example).
Additionally, Austin emphasized the role of context in driving language use -- language can only successfully act in a context in which necessary conditions of felicity are met. In no context, for example, could I conduct a marriage ceremony. Searle's elaboration of Speech-Act theory is deeply a part of recent cognitive science and studies in artificial intelligence. |
As proposed by Bronislaw Malinowski (in Coral Gardens and their Magic and in his contribution to I. A. Richards' and C. K. Ogden's The Meaning of Meaning) and elaborated by Raymond Firth and other anthropologists, this perspective insists that language is not a "countersign" of thought or a depiction of thought, but rather language originated in collaboration and work processes. Language is likely to be the result of the need to yell commands to your collaborators, like "pass the net" on a fishing boat. A key example, widely disseminated across disciplines, was the notion f "phatic utterance," like "Hello." |
The University of
Minnesota is an equal
opportunity
educator and employer.
Created by the
Department of Communication Studies
University of
Minnesota
The views and opinions
expressed in this page are strictly those of the page author.
The contents of this page have not
been reviewed or approved by the University of Minnesota.
http://www.comm.umn.edu/burke/pandcinfl.html
Last revised: 1 October 2003.